I thought I'd jump on band wagon and abuse the word "brilliant" like everyone else.
Still, it's a good piece that puts the whole "Imus as poor wittle victim" in perspective.
The Individualist: Don Imus Sucks
Posted by Joe Rivett on 04.17.2007
Thank God the free market got this racist jerk off the air...
For eleven years, I have never understood the appeal of Don Imus. Ever since I saw his non-telegenic face, (He makes Alan Colmes look like a sexy beast!) I asked myself how someone so awful sounding and looking could get such a nice gig.
Did he get the gig because he was funny? Imus claims that his show is a "comedy" show. Yet, MSNBC is not on par with Comedy Central. Did he get the gig because he was politically astute? I wouldn't put Imus on par with Rush or the sexy Stephanie Miller. So how the hell did this man become so popular?
A long time ago Don Imus did a morning show on WNBC in NYC. Morning shows were a lot different then because there was a lot of music and no more than a minute or two of talking. All of this took Don Imus to the top until a man named Howard Stern came along.
Howard came to the realization that any idiot can play music so it was more important to focus on the 'talk' aspect of radio. He realized listeners wanted a DJ who was honest, funny, and willing to push the envelope in the name of entertainment. Stern was able to do racial humor and make it work because he was a Jew who grew up in a black neighborhood and his sidekick was a black woman.
When Stern began to beat Imus in the ratings, Imus figured he just had to be like Howard. The problem was that white old redneck could not be as funny as a cultured Jew. To make matters worse, Imus sounded like a racist. And there was a reason why he sounded like a racist… Because he was a racist.
According to Howard Stern, Imus regularly called the WNBC black secretary a nigger to her face. If that doesn't make you a racist, I don't know what else does. Not only is he a racist but he is a misogynist too. According to Keith Olberman of MSNBC, Imus often reduced women to tears that worked for him. When Imus was hospitalized with a collapsed lung, he referred to the nurses as whores and complained that his private chef could cook better than the hospital food.
When I heard Imus refer to the Rutgers women's basketball team as "nappy headed hoes," I wasn't surprised. What made this worse than other incidents is that the racist term "nappy headed" sounds Jim Crowish (If that makes sense). Plus, as Snoop Dogg eloquently put it, he only refers to hos as hos whereas Imus called college educated women hos and said the Tennessee team was better looking which is racist code for 'light-skinned blacks.'
To make matters worse, Imus decided to go on Al Sharpton's radio show to apologize. Did he really think Al Sharpton would accept his apology? And what a show Imus tried to put on. He tried to hoodwink America. Did you notice he didn't wear that stupid cowboy hat? And now we all know why he wears that ugly hat with that hairstyle. He then tried to show his racial sensitivity by talking about how he helps black children at his ranch.
So Imus tried to use sick children to defend himself. Oh because Imus drove a black child to the hospital, that makes him racially sensitive? No, it makes you human. He tried other arguments to prove he wasn't racist by boldly stating the federal government does not spend enough on sickle cell. It seemed like Imus was apologizing to save his career. My question is why? Imus is 66-67 years old. He could have just said I'm sorry and went about his business. He was under contract and was going to get paid ten million a year whether or not he got fired.
Al Sharpton was a sleaze ball too. I'm certainly not a perfect Christian but one of the basic tenants of Christianity is forgiveness. Sharpton demanded an apology and when Imus apologized, he didn't accept it. Sharpton also seems to have forgotten Jesus' philosophy of he who has not sinned throw the first stone, (Or something like that). Sharpton has made many offensive comments throughout his career and when he ran for president, did some highly questionable things with campaign money. I'm not going to get into what he said because it out there and I don't want this column to sound like, "Well, Sharpton is racist too."
I'm happy that Sharpton did not force NBC and CBS to fire Imus but rather advertisers did. Once again ladies and gentlemen, we didn't need the FCC to fine Imus, we didn't need politicians to solve the problem, but the free market solved the problem. When Joshua White wrote about Libertarian censorship this is why I do not feel the need to have government get involved in the business of telling us what to watch and listen to.
I'm surprised that I did not come to Imus' defense. I am usually a disgustingly strong observer of the first amendment. I even believe it is okay to yell fire in a theater, because if no one runs out, then there is no point prosecuting someone. I am not defending Imus because I honestly believe he is a no talent hack. All he did was play music for years and Stern forced him to do something he wasn't good at: talking. He was an asshole and I don't like to defend assholes.
Every Internet columnist wants to use this incident to have a racial discussion. Now we are going to debate whether or not rappers should use the term hos. They should. Remember, art is a reflection of society. Why is rap violent, because the inner-city is violent. Why do they rap about drugs, because a lot of people are addicted. Why do they rap about gangs, because there are lots of gangs. Why do they rap about sex, because people like to have sex. If inner city rappers write songs about working in a law firm, nobody will buy it. It won't be real.
So what we should learn from Imus is that racist terminology is not accepted by the free market. Advertisers do not feel like dealing with the wrath of Al Sharpton. We don't need the FCC to police the airwaves. Remember when the Janet Jackson breast incident happened, people were outraged and we haven't seen anything close to a boob since. Asking hip hop culture to write music about what white people experience isn't going to work either. If we want rappers to write more positive music, maybe society needs to figure how to solve the problems of the inner city.
Ben here, again. I don't know who this guy is, but I like him. He's the first person, other than me, who's made sense during this whole diatribe. I've been saying all along, the whole "let's blame musicians for all the problems faced by factions of the black community" is ridiculous. During the 60's it was, let's blame rock musicians for instilling the youth of America with anti-government sentiment. The 70's was time to blame punk music for the high rate of teenage suicide and drug use. Then in the 80's it was let's blame ALL popular culture for destroying society. Performers are such great scapegoats. Blame them, and you don't have to deal with the real problems at hand. My rule of thumb has always been, avoid the easy answers. Especially when you see a lot of not so bright people standing in line behind them. These people are sheep. Don't be a sheep.
Recent Comments